Tuesday, February 25, 2020

International Management of Starbucks Case Study

International Management of Starbucks - Case Study Example Accommodating fast growth also meant putting in systems to recruit, hire, and train baristas and store managers. (Student Resources:2005) Starbucks' is simply looking for passionate people who love coffee, diverse workforce which reflects their community and who enjoys what they're doing and for whom work is an extension of themselves. 16 Some 80 percent of Starbucks employees were white, 85 percent had some education beyond high school, and the average age was 26. All positions are filled internally about 60-70%. Automated staffing services between hiring managers and staffing teams and Starbucks has a user friendly field sourcing and selection tools in place. Internal movement processes and systems in place and broadly understood. (Student Resources:2005) Campus recruiting are also in place for all major areas of the company and also place intern programs to early identify future talent. Management also relocates benchmarked at or below industry averages. Moreover, cutting edge technology and processes employed for candidate pre-screening because of well defined department metric in place and continually improving. The Starbucks Corporation does not allocate money to its stores for hiring janitors. Every aspect of the cleaning process in Starbucks stores is carried out by the baristas. (Student Resources:2005) The same people who make the drinks are scrubbing the bathroom floors. The baristas of each store work in different shifts throughout the day, usually divided two ones, morning and afternoon, or three morning, afternoon and evening. Each shift is consisted of usually of three or four baristas, the number may change, depending on customer flow of the specific store, who share different duties throughout the shift. Usually, a store is internally divided between floor, where the baristas work and serve customers and the back, usually referred to the storage room, bathrooms. Unless very small, the store usually also has a caf section, where the customers can sit down with their coffee. Starbucks during Global Expansion The global expansion of Starbucks was not an overnight success especially in Asia. There have been numerous challenges that Starbucks have to encounter in penetrating the Asian Market (Culpan, 2002). For example in China and Japan, they had a difficulty in creating a coffee market niche because of the prevailing tea market in China and Japan for over 50 years and yet Starbucks have to create Chinese and Japanese Starbucks to suit the taste of the coffee market in these countries . Starbucks also have to worry of the national based coffee shops in the Asian countries, such as Japan based- Manave Coffee, Taiwan based Dante coffee, Mocha Blends in the Philippines and even Mc Caf of McDonalds. Another difficulty that Starbucks faced during their expansion is that opening a coffee in a country needs different strategic orientations, organizational structures and management process because it does not mean that Starbucks in the United States since it's the father branch, it reflects the same characteristics as the other countries. At the same time, Starbucks also has to evolve its principles from being an international company into a transnational company because they have to undergo a lot of changes in the global business environment (Culpan, 2002).

Saturday, February 8, 2020

Should Parents have a Another Child to Save the Life of Another Child Research Paper

Should Parents have a Another Child to Save the Life of Another Child - Research Paper Example Long term repercussions have not been determined as of yet because most of the children born are still underage. Society may not see the negative effects that this process can have on the child until several more years from now, when the child is an adult. As a child, he or she has no choice to donate or not, it is up to the parents. It is definitely heart wrenching to see your child die a little more each day, but parents and society must learn the effects that having another child to save the sick one will have. The opposition is just as outspoken. If a child’s life can be saved, then anything should be done to save it. The opposition has appealing concepts and qualities. No one wants to see a child die, especially the parents of that child. Everything that can be done should be done. Keeping that humane value in mind, during 2002 the Human Fertilization and Embryology Authority (HFEA) in England laid the basis for an outrageous debate not only in media, but in the ethical c ircles too, when they allowed a family to have a baby that will be genetically selected to cure the chronical disease of its sibling. A group of medical and scientific researchers fully supported the idea to have a baby as a savior for its sibling. It is ethically acceptable to create an offspring to save the life of a desperately ill sibling. ... al., as cited in Pentz, R., et. al., 2008). They also argue that life is a precious thing and it is obligatory for us to save each and every life when we can do it with available technologies in 21st century. It is better than seeing a child dying with Fanconi anemia. It is heart rendering as a human to see people losing strings to life with peeling mucous membranes, sloughing skin and mouths with pouring bloods. No matter, whatever it takes but lives should be saved (Belkin, 2001). Aulisio, May and Block (2001) indicate that "as a matter of social policy there is no justificatory ground for prohibiting parents from having a child to save a child." They see it quite ethical if a child is brought into existence for specific reasons. Whatever happens next to the donor child is the area of main concern while rest lies with the decision of donation that is taken either by the donor or parents. If the minor donor is involved and is not able to take decision then the donation should be don e in the best interest of the donor. For me, infact the idea to create a child as a donor for bone marrow transplant for curing a medically vulnerable sibling, seem awful to all acceptable ethical standards. This is a fact that lot of children born, are from unplanned pregnancies and after the initial shock of the parents, excitement ensues. The baby is born and the parents are happy, proud, and full of love and hopes for the future. Other children are planned and parents experience the same feelings. What happens when that child that is so loved and nurtured becomes so ill that he or she needs a bone marrow transplant in order to survive?